Preview

Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University

Advanced search

Cognitive Structure of Concept INTUITION

https://doi.org/10.25587/SVFU.2019.70.28407

Abstract

The article discusses the semantic, pragmatic and syntactic aspects of the concept of INTUITION, revealing its objectification in the English language worldview. The objective of the work is to study the conceptual ontology of an irrational understanding, to identify and describe the cognitive structure of the concept under study. The work uses the methods of cognitive interpretation, which consists in the identification and description of cognitive features that form the content of the concept under study; cognitive modeling, which is the construction of idealized structures contingent with the organization of information in the human mind. The cognitive and perceptual forms of intuitive awareness are closely interrelated, reflecting through the prism of human cognitive activity two main components of the phenomenon being studied - intellectual and sensual. In the present work, the categories of sensation and understanding, as components of the semiosphere of the inner world of man, are interconnected and form the medial semantic space of an irrational understanding - intuition. In the semantic aspect, the essence of the concept INTUITION is objectified by conceptual signs of insight, belief, feeling, perception, apprehension, cognition, knowledge, understanding. The structure of irrational understanding includes cognitive signs of surprise, logical groundlessness, unconsciousness and irrationalness. The pragmatic aspect of the INTUITION concept in this article is considered from the standpoint of a positive and negative assessment of this phenomenon by the English-speaking subject. Through the cognitive modeling method, additional conceptual features of the concept under study are identified: the anthropomorphic metaphorical model INTUITION IS A HUMAN BEING, the ontological model INTUITION IS A HUMAN SOUL, the artifact model INTUITION IS A VALUABLE THING. In the syntactic aspect, constructions with connectors are considered that reveal the content of the concept under study and manifest its relationship with such mental-lingual formations as CREATIVITY, EXPERIENCE, SELF-COGNITION, EMOTION, FEELING. The analysis of language factology demonstrates the interdependence of intuition and sensory perception, emotional experience, self-knowledge of a person with creative potential, accumulating direct knowledge, images, symbols and associations from the external world based on social intelligence and abstract sensations. The results can be useful for further study of the semiosphere of the inner world of a person, as well as works on cognitive linguistics and psycholinguistics.

About the Authors

D. A. Aripova
Irkutsk National Research Technical University, Irkutsk, Russia
Russian Federation


R. P. Ivanova
M.K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University, Mirny, Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. Мудрагей Н. С. Очерки истории западноевропейского иррационализма. - М.: Наука, 2002. - 112 с.

2. Апресян Ю. Д. Экспериментальная, прикладная и теоретическая лингвистика: обратные связи // Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 33. - Wien, 1992. - S. 5-27.

3. Кубрякова Е. С. Язык и знание: На пути получения знаний о языке. Части речи с когнитивной точки зрения. - М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2004. - 560 с.

4. Стернин И. А. Когнитивная интерпретация в лингвокогнитивных исследованиях // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. - 2004. - №1. - С. 65-69.

5. Иванова Р. П. Эгоцентрические категории: Human Sensations в современном английском языке: дис. … канд. филол. наук. - Иркутск: Иркутский государственный лингвистический университет, 2009. - 195 с.

6. Арипова Д. А. Функционально-семантическая категория Understanding в современном английском языке: дис. … канд. филол. наук. - Иркутск: Иркутский государственный лингвистический университет, 2011. - 209 с.

7. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. London, The university of Chicago press, 2003. - 272 p.

8. Морозов И. М. Природа интуиции. - Минск: Университетское, 1990. - 141 с.

9. Betsch T. The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making // Intuition in Judgment and Decision Making. - New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2008. - P. 3-22.

10. Зеленский В. В. Толковый словарь по аналитической психологии. - М.: Когито-Центр, 2008. - 336 с.

11. BYU-BNC - British National Corpus. URL: http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/

12. COCA - Corpus of Contemporary American English. URL: https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/

13. OCED - Oxford Collocations English Dictionary. URL: http://oxforddictionary.so8848.com

14. Иванова Р. П. Структура функционально-семантического поля Human Sensations: особенности маргинальной зоны // Вестник Ленинградского государственного университета им. А. С. Пушкина. Сер. Филология. - 2013. - № 1. T.7. - С. 35-43.

15. QG - Quote Garden. URL: http://www.quotegarden.com/intuition.html

16. Йомдин Б. Л. Языковая модель понимания // Языковая картина мира и системная лексикография. - М.: Языки русской культуры, 2006. - С. 513-612.

17. GNU - Collaborative International Dictionary of English. - URL: http://gcide.gnu.org.ua

18. WUED - Webster’s Unabridged English Dictionary. - URL: http://unabridged.merriam-webster.com

19. OALD - Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. - URL: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com

20. Thesaurus of ERIC Descriptors. James E. Houston Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001. 731p.

21. Болдырев Н. Н. Концептуальное пространство когнитивной лингвистики // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. - 2004. №1. - С. 18-36.

22. Wolf G. Cognition as comprehension // Scientific Studies of Reading. 2001. - 5(3). - P. 211-239.

23. Гусев С. С. Смысл возможного. Коннотационная семантика. - СПб.: Алетейя, 2002. - 382 c.

24. Petervari J., Osman M., Bhattacharya J. The Role of Intuition in the Generation and Evaluation Stages of Creativity. - URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5028408/

25. Национальная психологическая академия. - URL: https://vocabulary.ru/termin/irracionalnoe.html

26. Capraro V., Cococcioni G. Social setting, intuition and experience in laboratory experiments interact to shape cooperative decision-making. - URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26156762

27. Gigerenzer G., Gaissmaier W. Heuristic decision making // Annual Review of Psychology. 2011. Vol. 62. - P. 451-482.

28. Богатырев Д. К. Познание. Опыт. Мышление. Интуиция. Интуитивизм // Вестник Русской христианской гуманитарной академии. - 2014. - Т.15. Вып. 4. - С. 12-31.

29. Калашникова Л. В. Метафора и когнитивно-дискурсивное моделирование действительности. - Орел: Изд-во Орел ГАУ, 2008. -304 с.

30. Бондаренко А. В. Место интуиции в научном и художественном творчестве // Вестник Башкирского университета. - 2006. - Вып. 4. - С. 183-185.


Review

For citations:


Aripova D.A., Ivanova R.P. Cognitive Structure of Concept INTUITION. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. 2019;(2):74-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/SVFU.2019.70.28407

Views: 124


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2222-5404 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5620 (Online)