Associate Field of the “Justice” Concept in Modern Youth Speech (on the Example of NEFU Students Survey)

The article deals with the concepts of law in the linguistic consciousness of modern youth, as well as the dynamics of its meaning. Polysemy of the concept of law leads to the absence of strictly verbalized meaning. In the explanatory dictionaries there are five models of the meaning of the word "right", this leads to a complication in understanding the essence and value of law. The main goal of the research is to reveal the associative field of the concept of law in the speech of students of the law faculty and students of the non-legal profile of the North-Eastern Federal University M.K. Ammosov. In the scientific literature, the results of research on the linguistic consciousness of representatives of one culture are mainly given. In this study, the students are students of two cultures (mainly Yakut and Russian). Attention is given to the semantic meaning of the concept of law and the degree of formation of the sense of justice of the younger generation. Research methods: free associative method, statistical analysis and modeling of associative connections. Interpretation of data using the following procedures: 1) all reactions of the subjects are counted and distributed across associative fields; 2) the analysis is carried out among the contents of images of consciousness reflecting the associative links of each group. These methods showed a meaningful analysis of the images of consciousness and the relation to the concept of the right of two groups of students. The work is carried out at the junction of psycholinguistics, cognitive linguistics and linguoculturology. In the study, significant attention is paid to the associative links between the concepts of law and freedom. The analysis led to the conclusions: firstly, the differences in the understanding of law were not revealed in the language consciousness of students of the law faculty and students of other faculties; secondly, the word law does not make sense as an advantage, a privilege, a prerogative, a privilege; Third, in modern youth, the concepts of law and freedom become concepts that are close in meaning, and in associative connections- interchangeable.

1. Skorobogatov A. V. Koncept «pravo» v rossijskom yuridicheskom diskurse // Aktual'nye problemy ehkonomiki i prava». 2013. № 4. – S. 233-237.

2. Gopka YU. A., Nechepurenko M. YU. KONCEPT «PRAVO» V PUBLICISTICHESKOM STILE // Mezhdunarodnyj studencheskij nauchnyj vestnik. – 2015. – № 5 (chast' 1) – S. 95-96.

3. Kushnir O. N. MAKROKONCEPTY «PRAVO/ZAKON» I «MORAL'/NRAVSTVENNOST'»: «FIGURY KONFLIKTA» V POLE VZAIMODEJSTVIYA // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, № 1 (12) 2012. – S. 98-100.

4. Bajdavletova L. R. Konceptosfera «Pravo-Zakon-Prestuplenie-Miloserdie-Nakazanie» v russkoj yazykovoj kartine mira (na materiale frazeologii): avtoref. diss. na soiskanie kand. filologicheskih nauk. Ufa, maj, 2013 g. – 21 s.

5. SHafikova R. R. Leksiko-semanticheskoe pole konceptov «pravo» i «zakon» kak nacional'no-kul'turnyj fon (na materiale bashkirskih narodnyh i anglijskih poslovic i pogovorok)»/ Vestnik CHelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2015. № 5. – S. 132-136.

6. Galieva D. I. Konceptual'noe pole «Pravo i Zakon» v russkoj yazykovoj kartine mira kak osnova formirovaniya professional'noj rechi studentov-yuristov [Tekst] / D. I. Galieva // YAzykovaya lichnost': Lingvokul'turologiya. Lingvodidaktika. Leksikografiya / pod red. V.V. Vorob'eva i L.G. Sayahovoj. – Ufa: BGU, 2001. – S. 140.

7. Stephanopoulos N., Ginsburg T. The Concepts of Law // Univ. Chic. Law Rev. 2017. Vol. 84, № 1. P. 147-175.

8. Sichinava N. G. Slovo «zakon» v drevnosti i segodnya// Materialy III-ej mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii «YAzyk i pravo: aktual'nye problemy vzaimodejstviya», Vyp. 3. – Rostov-na-Donu: Donskoe knizhnoe izd-vo, 2013. – S. 38-42.

9. Vinogradov V. V. Istoriya slov: okolo 1500 slov i vyrazhenij i bolee 5000 slov, s nimi svyazannyh / Otv. Red. N. YU. SHvedova.– M.: «Tolk», 1994. – 1138 s.

10. Preobrazhenskij A. G. EHtimologicheskij slovar' russkogo yazyka. Tom vtoroj (P-S). – 416 s.

11. Fasmer M. EHtimologicheskij slovar' russkogo yazyka /perevod O.N. Trubacheva. V 4-h tomah. Tom 3. M.: Progress, 1986. https://vasmer.lexicography.online/

12. Ozhegov S. I. Tolkovyj slovar' russkogo yazyka. – 28-e izd., pererab. – M.: Izd-vo Oniks-LIT, 2012. – 1376 s.

13. Lopatin V. V., Lopatina L. E. Russkij tolkovyj slovar'.-7-e izd., ispr. i dop. – M.: Rus.yaz., 2001. – 882 s.

14. Abramov N. Slovar' russkih sinonimov i skhodnyh po smyslu vyrazhenij. – M.: Russkie slovari, 1999. – 530 s.

15. Slovar' russkih sinonimov (P) / http://synonymonline.ru/

16. Rumyancev O. G., Dodonnov V. N. YUridicheskij ehnciklopedicheskij slovar'. – M.: INFRA-M, 1996. – 384 s.

17. Tihomirova L. V., Tihomirov M. YU. YUridicheskaya ehnciklopediya. Izd-e 5-e, pererab. i dop. – M.: Izd. M. YU. Tihomirova, 2014. – 972 s.

18. Bol'shoj yuridicheskij slovar' (bolee 6000 terminov i opredelenij) (P) / https://petroleks.ru/dictionaries/dict_big_law16.php

19. Bubnova I. A., Kazachenko O. V. Kul'turnye konstanty russkogo obraza mira na sovremennom ehtape razvitiya obshchestva / Voprosy psiholingvistiki. № 2 (36), 2018. – S. 28-41.

20. Zalevskaya A. A. Slovo v leksikone cheloveka (Psiholingvisticheskoe issledovanie) / A. A. Zalevskaya. – Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezh. un-ta, 1990. – 205 s.

21. Arhipova S. V. Associativnyj ehksperiment v piskholingvistike. Vestnik Buryatskogo universiteta, № 11, 2011. – S. 6-9.

22. Pishchal'nikova V. A. Istoriya i teoriya piskholingvistiki. Kurs lekcij. CH. 2. EHtnopiskholingvistika. M.: Izd-vo MGLU, 2007. – 208 s.

23. Beskorovajnaya I. G. Associativnyj ehksperiment kak sposob rekonstrukcii fragmentov yazykovogo soznaniya. – Voprosy piskholingvistiki. № 2, 2004. – S. 73-77.

24. Tarasov E. F. Soznanie: soderzhanie i funkcionirovanie. XIII Mezhdunarodnyj simpozium po psiholingvistike i teorii kommunikacii. – M., 2003. – S. 3-10.

25. Nikaeva T. M. EHtnokul'turnaya specifika obraza sebya i obraza drugogo v yazykovom soznanii russkih, yakutov, ehvenkov i ehvenov: diss. na soiskanie … k. f. n. – M., 2013. – 228 s.

26. Zalevskaya A. A. Vvedenie v psiholingvistiku: uchebnik / A. A. Zalevskaya. – M.: Rossijsk. gos. gumanit. un-t, 1999. – 382 s.

27. YUng K. G. Analiticheskaya psihologiya: Proshloe i nastoyashchee / K. G. YUng, EH. Sehmyuehls, V. Odajnik, Dzh. Habbehk ; sost. V. V. Zelenskij, A. M. Rutkevich. – M.: Martis, 1997. – 320 s.

28. Karaulov YU. N., Sorokin YU. S., Tarasov E. F., Ufimceva N. V., CHerkasova G. A. Russkij associativnyj slovar'. Kn. 1-6. – M., 1994-1998. Kn.1. – S. 193.

29. Kramsch C. Language and cu ture. Oxford University Press, 2000. P. 80.

30. Voprosy organizacii leksikona cheloveka v lingvisticheskih i psihologicheskih issledovaniyah: ucheb. posobie / A. A. Zalevskaya; Kalinin. gos. un-t. – Kalinin : KGU, 1978. – 88 s.

31. Karaulov YU. N. Pokazateli nacional'nogo mentaliteta v associativno-verbal'noj seti // YAzykovoe soznanie i obraz mira / otv. red. N.V. Ufimceva. – M.: IYA RAN, 2000. – S. 191-206.