Preview

Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University

Advanced search

Lexico-semantic field and thematic-rhematic coherence as representatives of the archetypal "friend/enemy" dichotomy in Somerset Maugham's short story "A friend in need"

https://doi.org/10.25587/2222-5404-2025-22-4-94-105

Abstract

The article presents a comprehensive linguistic analysis of the representation of the archetypal "Friend/Enemy" dichotomy in Somerset Maugham's short story "A Friend In Need" through the prism of lexico-semantic fields and thematic-rhematic coherence. The relevance of the research is due to the growing interest in the study of cognitive and archetypal foundations of discourse, as well as the need to expand the methodological tools of text linguistics in the analysis of deep semantic structures. The problem of the work is related to the paradoxical combination of outwardly friendly behavior and deep hostility in the text of the story, which creates the effect of cognitive dissonance. The aim of the study is to identify and analyze the linguistic mechanisms of representation of this dichotomy through a system of interacting lexico-semantic fields and the features of thematic progression. The methodology is based on an integrated approach combining methods of component, contextual and distributive analysis with elements of discourse analysis. As a result of the study, the complex structure of the interpenetrating lexical and semantic fields "Friendship" and "Hostility" was revealed, the features of the thematic-rhematic progression with a gradual shift in focus from external characteristics to hidden motives were identified, stylistic techniques (irony, antithesis, euphemisms) that enhance the contrast between the external benevolence and internal hostility of the protagonist were analyzed. Special attention is paid to the final dialogue, which destroys the thematic-rhematic coherence of the text. The prospects of the research are related to the expansion of the analysis to other texts of S. Maugham's short stories in order to identify systemic linguistic mechanisms of representation of archetypal dichotomies, as well as to the development of an integrative methodology for the analysis of archetypal concepts in artistic discourse.

About the Author

E. S. Baranova
Irkutsk State Transport University
Russian Federation

Evgenia S. BARANOVAPostgraduate student, Lecturer, Department of General Education Disciplines, Zabaikalsky Institute of Railway Transport

ResearcherID: rid102210

Chita



References

1. Jung K. Archetype and symbol. Moscow: Publishing House “Kanon+”; 2020:336. (in Russian)

2. Galperin IR. Text as an object of linguistic research. Moscow: Publishing House “URSS”; 2018:144. (in Russian)

3. Kubryakova ES. Language and knowledge: On the way to gaining knowledge about language. Moscow: Publishing House “Languages of Slavic Culture”; 2019:560. (in Russian)

4. Nikolaeva TM. Linguistics of the text: Current state and prospects. Moscow: Publishing House “URSS”; 2017:168. (in Russian)

5. Karaulov YuN. General and Russian ideography. Moscow: Publishing House “Nauka”; 2016:356. (in Russian)

6. Shmelev DN. Problems of semantic analysis of vocabulary. Moscow: Publishing House “URSS”; 2017:280. (in Russian)

7. Zolotova GA. Communicative grammar of the Russian language. Moscow: Publishing House “Nauka”; 2019:528. (in Russian)

8. Paducheva EV. The statement and its correlation with reality. Moscow: Publishing House “URSS”; 2018:296. (in Russian)

9. Lakoff J. The metaphors we live by. Moscow: Publishing House “URSS”; 2016:256. (in Russian)

10. Campbell J. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Saint Petersburg: Publishing House “Piter”; 2018:352. (in Russian)

11. Likhachev DS. The Conceptual Sphere of the Russian language. RAS: Literature and Language Series; 1993:3-9. (in Russian)

12. Akhmanova OS. Dictionary of linguistic terms. Moscow: Publishing House “Soviet Encyclopedia”; 1966:608. (in Russian)

13. van Dijk T.A. Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol. 2. Dimensions of Discourse. London: Academic Press; 1985:1-15. (in English)

14. Dane F. Theme and rhema in a functional perspective. Moscow: Publishing House “Progress”; 1974:23-45. (in Russian)

15. Данеш Ф. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. – Prague: Academia, 1964. – рр. 45-67. (in English)

16. Maugham, S. A Friend In Need: The Complete Short Stories of W. Somerset Maugham. Vol. 1. – London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1951. – рр. 275-280. (in English)

17. Arnold IV. Stylistics. Modern English. Moscow: Publishing House “Flinta”; 2002:384. (in Russian)

18. Skrebnev YuM. Fundamentals of the stylistics of the English language. Moscow: Publishing House “Vysshaya shkola”; 2003:224. (in Russian)

19. Kukharenko VA. Stylistics of the English language. Moscow: Publishing House “Vysshaya shkola”; 1988:240. (in Russian)

20. Galperin IR. Essays on the stylistics of the English language. Moscow: Publishing House “Nauka”; 1981:208. (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Baranova E.S. Lexico-semantic field and thematic-rhematic coherence as representatives of the archetypal "friend/enemy" dichotomy in Somerset Maugham's short story "A friend in need". Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. 2025;22(4):94-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2222-5404-2025-22-4-94-105

Views: 31

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2222-5404 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5620 (Online)