Study of computational stability of the high-latitude ionosphere model
https://doi.org/10.25587/2222-5404-2024-21-2-37-45
Abstract
The high latitude ionospheric plasma is a difficult medium to describe due to the dependence of its parameters on heliogeophysical conditions. Its large-scale structure is influenced by processes such as magnetospheric convection, plasmaspheric flows of particles and heat, as well as the precipitation of energetic particles in the region of the auroral oval. These processes are non-stationary and their characteristics change significantly during periods of enhanced geomagnetic activity. Therefore, the modelling of the high-latitude ionosphere is associated with the development of a model that has a computationally stable numerical solution at a sufficiently high spatio-temporal resolution. For this purpose, in this work, we have carried out a study of the computational stability of the mathematical model of the high-latitude ionosphere (Eulerian approach) when different integration steps in time and space are specified. It is shown that the ionospheric model retains computational stability at all selected steps, and the results of numerical calculations are qualitatively consistence and describe the main large-scale structural formations of the high-latitude ionosphere. The results show that the developed model can be used in the study of non-stationary processes occurring in the ionospheric plasma, as well as in the study of the ionosphere during magnetic storms and substorms.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. Yu. GololobovRussian Federation
Artem Y. Gololobov – Cand. S. (in Phys. & Math.), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Magnetospheric and Ionospheric Researches
Yakutsk
I. A. Golikov
Russian Federation
Innikentiy A . Golikov – Dr. S. (in Phys. & Math.), Professor, Chief Researcher, Laboratory of Magnetospheric and Ionospheric Researches
Yakutsk
References
1. Nishida A. Average structure and storm-time change of polar topside ionosphere at sunspot minimum. J. Geophys. Res., 1967;72(23):6051-6061.
2. Mizun, YuG., Polar ionosphere . Moscow : Nauka. 1980.
3. Galperin YuI, Ponomarev VN, Zosimov AG. Direct measurements of ion drift velocity in the upper ionosphere during magnetic storm. II. The measurement results during the magnetic storm 3 November 1967. Cosmic investigations, 1973;1(2):284-296.
4. Spiro RW. Rapid subauroral ion drifts observed by Atmospheric Explorer. Geophys. Res. Lett., 1979;6(8):657-660.
5. Stepanov AE, Khalipov VL, Golikov IA, et al. Polarisation jet: thin and fast subauroral ionospheric plasma drift, Russian academy of science, Yu.G. Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy, Yakutsk, 2017.
6. Golikov IA, Gololobov AYu, Popov VI. Numerical modeling of the thermal regime of the high-latitude ionosphere, Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University, 2012;9(3):22–28.
7. Golikov IA, Gololobov AYu, Popov VI. Modeling the electron temperature distribution in F2 region of high-latitude ionosphere for winter solstice conditions. Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2016;2(4):70-80.
8. Gololobov AYu, Golikov IA, Popov VI. Mathematical modeling of the high-latitude ionosphere taking into account offset between geographical and geomagnetic poles. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University, 2014;11(2):46–54.
9. Golikov I. Universal time control of the parameters of the electron temperature enhancement zone in the winter subauroral ionosphere. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics., 2020;211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105458
10. Schunk R. Electron temperature in the F regions of the ionosphere: theory and observations. Rev. Geophys., 1978;16:355–399.
11. David M. The effect of downward electron heat flow and electron cooling processes in the high-latitude ionosphere. J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 2011;73:2399–2409. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2011.08.009.
12. Picone JM. NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparison and scientific issues. J. Geophys. Res., 2002;107:1501–1516. doi:10.1029/2002JA009430.
13. Vorobyev V. Auroral Precipitation Model and its application to ionospheric and magnetospheric studies, J. Atmos. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 2013;102:157–171. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2013.05.007.
14. Fang X. Electron impact ionisation: A new parameterisation for 100 ev to 1 MeV electrons. J. Geophys. Res., 2008;113. A09311. doi:10.1029/2008JA013384.
15. Chapman S. The absorption and dissociative of ionising effect of monochromatic radiation in an atmosphere on a rotation. Earth. Proc. Phys. Soc., 1931;43:483–501. doi:10.1088/0959-5309/43/5/302.
16. Heppner JR. Empirical model of high-latitude electric field. J. Geophys. Res., 1977;82(7):1115-1125.
17. Osipov NK, Chernysheva SP, Mozhaev AM, et al. The role of convection, diffusion and flow exchange between the ionosphere and magnetosphere in the formation of the main structural forms of the F-region of the polar ionosphere. Proceeding of USSR Academy of Sciences conference “Dynamic processes and structure of the polar ionosphere. Apatity”, Apatity, 1980;11-21.
18. Schunk RW. Ionospheres: physics, plasma physics, and chemistry. NY: Cambridge University Press, 2009:640 p.
19. Samarskiy A. The theory of difference schemes. New York: Basel. Marcel, 2001.
Review
For citations:
Gololobov A.Yu., Golikov I.A. Study of computational stability of the high-latitude ionosphere model. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. 2024;21(2):37-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2222-5404-2024-21-2-37-45