Preview

Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University

Advanced search

Discourse and discourse analysis: concepts and characteristic aspects in communicative linguistics

https://doi.org/10.25587/2222-5404-2025-22-1-107-114

Abstract

Since the late 20th century and continuing into the first half of the 21st century the direction of linguistic research has been increasingly developed, significantly contributing to the current state of affairs in linguistics, theory and practice of translation, foreign language teaching methodology, and linguophilosophy. In recent decades, discourse analysis has been primarily concerned with the communicative aspects of language. Discourse analysis has become an increasingly prominent area in several humanities disciplines, including sociology, sociolinguistics, psychology, anthropology, linguistics, and linguophilosophy, as a linguistic phenomena. The communicative approach to language education, with its focus on practical communicative ability, necessitates the analysis of specific examples (written and spoken forms) to improve language learning methods, as well as to attract the available linguistic material. This study aims to identify key characteristic aspects of this modern direction, focusing on fundamental features of the concept of discourse. Because discourse is a common element across diverse fields in humanities, its examination through the frameworks of general information theory and communication theory is valuable, particularly in relation to its social functions.

About the Author

E. A. Libba
Middle Volga Institute (branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
Russian Federation

Elena A.  Libba– Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Associate Professor of the Department of Humanities and Socio-Economic Disciplines

Saransk



References

1. Foucault M. Archeology of knowledge. Kyiv: 1996:513 (in English).

2. Bouchard G. Michel Foucault: unité ou dispersion de l’oeuvre? In: Laval Théologique et Philosophique. Paris: Minuit; 2003;59(3):485-502 (in French).

3. Henry A, Roseberry RL. Using a small corpus to obtain data for teaching a genre. In: Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2001:93-133 (in English).

4. Flowerdew J. Academic Discourse. London: Pearson Education; 2002:264 (in English).

5. Gaskell D, Cobb T. Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors? System; 2004:301-319 (in English).

6. Hyland K. Teaching and researching writing. London: Pearson Education; 2002:324 (in English).

7. Carter-Thomas Sh, Rowley-Jolivet E. Syntactic differences in oral and written scientific discourse: the role of information structure. Asp: La revue du GERAS. 2019:37-42 (in English).

8. Resche C. Décryptage d’un genre particulier: les communiqués de presse de la Banque Centrale américaine. ASp: La revue du GERAS. 2003:21-35 (in French).

9. Laffont H. Un ingénieur est-il bien an engineer? ASp. 2006:9-21 (in French).

10. Percebois J. Les économistes universitaires français et leurs homologues anglais et américains: aspects institutionnels, culturels et linguistiques. ASp: La revue du GERAS. 2006:79-91 (in French).

11. Sinclair J. How to use corpora in language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2004:317 (in English).

12. Johns T. Data-driven learning page. In: Language learning as discourse analysis: Implications for the LSP learning environment. Asp: La revue du GERAS. 2007;(51-52):35-51 (in English).

13. Gaskell D, Cobb T. Is there any measurable learning from hands-on concordancing? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997:301-315 (in English)


Review

For citations:


Libba E.A. Discourse and discourse analysis: concepts and characteristic aspects in communicative linguistics. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. 2025;22(1):107-114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2222-5404-2025-22-1-107-114

Views: 35


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2222-5404 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5620 (Online)