The place of discourse analysis as an analytical method of text and speech interpretation in modern linguistics (on the example of sports communication research)
https://doi.org/10.25587/2222-5404-2024-21-2-169-181
Abstract
This article is devoted to the consideration of discourse studies development as well as that of discourse analysis. This method makes it possible to take into account not only the linguistic (verbal) aspect, but also the supra-linguistic (extra-verbal) one, as it also focuses on the situational peculiarities of the text or statements, their pragmatic and functional features, the cultural and historical context, and many other factors. Nowadays discourse analysis is widely used for interdisciplinary research, which determines the relevance of studying the prospects for its further use. This work provides a historical overview of discourse studies formation and development. Various approaches to the key concept interpretation from this area, which is discourse, are analysed. The process of discourse analysis formation as one of the most important parts of the conceptual and categorical apparatus of discourse studies as well as various approaches to its implementation are considered. Some new ways of using discourse analysis to conduct research on various institutional types of communication are proposed, which is demonstrated by the example of implementing this method in the study of sports rhetoric.
About the Author
K. I. Stefanouskaya
Belarusian State University
Belarus
Belarus
Katsiaryna I. Stefanouskaya – Senior Lecturer of the Translation Theory and Practice Department, Faculty of Social and Cultural Communications
Minsk
References
1. Norman BYu. Theory of language: Introductory course: textbook. Moscow: Nauka, 2009:296.
2. Heidegger M. Language/Translation and notes by B. V. Markov. St. Petersburg: Leningrad Union of Scientists. URL:http://lib.ru/HEIDEGGER/yazyk.txt (Accessed: 02 July 2023).
3. Norman BYu. Cognitive syntax of the Russian language: textbook. Moscow: Nauka, 2018:254.
4. Mechkovskaya NB. Philosophy of language and communication: textbook. Moscow: Nauka, 2018:520.
5. Uspensky BA. Language universals and actual problems of typological description of language. Moscow: Nauka, 1969:5–18.
6. Mechkovskaya NB. General linguistics: Structural and social typology of languages: textbook for students of philological and linguistic specialities. Moscow: Flinta, 2020:312.
7. Zelenkov AI. Philosophical and methodological research. Philosophy and values of national culture [Electronic resource]. Minsk: BSU, 2021;4(1) electronic optical disc (CD-ROM).
8. Norman BYu. Game on the facets of language. Moscow: Flinta, 2020:344.
9. Makarov ML. Fundamentals of discourse theory. Moscow: Gnosis, 2003:280.
10. Foucault M. Archaeology of knowledge. Translated from French by Mitin S. and Stasov D. Kiev: Nika-Centre, 1996:208.
11. Derrida J. Writing and Difference. Translated from French by Kraletchkin D. St. Petersburg: Academic Project, 2000:495.
12. Dake van TA. Towards the definition of discourse. Psychological Network of the Russian Internet, Available at: http://psyberlink.flogiston.ru/internet/bits/vandijk2.htm. [Accessed: 15 July 2023].
13. Yartseva VN. (ed.) Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia, 1990:688.
14. Barkovich AA. Internet discourse: meta-linguistic models of practice. Vestnik VSU, Series: Linguistics, 2015;5:171–183.
15. Stefanouskaya KI. Multidimensionality of metaphorical projection in English- and Russian-language sports discourse. National cultures in intercultural communication: a collection of scientific articles: in 2 vol. Minsk: Kolorgrad, 2016;1:464–470.
16. Dake van TA. Language. Cognition. Communication. Blagoveshchensk: I.A. Baudouin de Courtenay, 2000:308.
17. Karasik VI. Discursology as a direction of communicative linguistics. Actual problems of philology and pedagogical linguistics, 2016;1:17-33.
18. Klimchenko SG. Definition of the concept and content of discourse analysis. In: Linguistics, linguodidactics, linguoculturology: current issues and prospects of development: proceedings of the III International scientific and practical conference. Minsk: BSU, 2019;340–343.
19. Kibrick AA. Modus, genre and other parameters of discourse classification. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2009;2:3–21.
20. Irkhin YV. Discourse analysis: essence, approaches, methodology, design. Socio-humanitarian knowledge, 2014;4:128–143.
21. Stefanouskaya KI. Metaphor as a tool of aesthetisation and expression of modern sports media discourse. In: Iuchankov VI. (ed.) Stylistics, Language, Mention and Text. Minsk: Education and Science, 2017;127–135.
22. Stefanouskaya KI. To the question about the use of the lexeme "Victoria" in diachronic aspect. In: National cultures in intercultural communication: proceedings of the VII International scientific and practical conference. Minsk: BSU, 2023;45–51.
Review
For citations:
Stefanouskaya K.I. The place of discourse analysis as an analytical method of text and speech interpretation in modern linguistics (on the example of sports communication research). Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. 2024;21(2):169-181. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2222-5404-2024-21-2-169-181
Views:
138
Email this article 