Preview

Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University

Advanced search

Reception of Pushkin’s personality and works in the lyrics of Yakut poets of the 20th – early 21st centuries

https://doi.org/10.25587/2222-5404-2025-22-2-217-226

Abstract

The influence of the personality and creative heritage of Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin on his contemporaries and descendants – artists of words – cannot be overestimated. Both critics and the authors themselves of both Russian and national literature (since the 19th century) have repeatedly noted that the experience of the great teacher and fighter became for them a model and guideline in the search for their own creative path. This article attempts to analyze the receptive perception of creativity and personality of A.S. Pushkin by Yakut poets of the 20th – early 21st centuries. The purpose of this study is to consider the thematic and motif-figurative reception of Pushkin’s works and biography in the literary output of Yakut poets. The analysis revealed that the key themes of the analyzed poems are the themes of struggle and freedom, slave past and free future, life and death, memory and gratitude. Image of A.S. Pushkin is recreated in all the greatness of his creative genius: a champion, a conductor of free will, the founder of Russian literature and many national literatures, at the same time, he is the closest brother of the quill. All poems are united by the main idea of glorifying the genius of Russian literature. The research material was the poems of Yakut poets translated into Russian, included in the publication dedicated to the 220th anniversary of the birth of A.S. Pushkin. This article’s theoretical basis includes the works of N.N. Levakin and E.G. Melnikova. Based on the works of domestic and foreign literary scholars, the authors emphasize the importance of the receptive approach to the analysis of a literary text as a carrier of a certain set of echoes of previous cultural experience. The poet, when creating a work, implicitly relies on what he has read earlier, refracting the experience gained through the prism of the individual author’s worldview. The result is an original text in which the author’s “receptive experience” “shines through.” Furthermore, the perception of a literary work depends on objective social and historical factors, as well as on the individual and personal traits of the recipient.

About the Author

N. V. Chaunina
Neryungri Technical Institute (branch) of the M.K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University, Neryungri, Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Natalia V. Chaunina – Cand. Sci. (Philology), Associate Professor, Department of Economic, Humanitarian and General Education Disciplines



References

1. Trofimova NV. The image of the eagle in the Russian literary tradition and the work of A. S. Pushkin. Russkaya slovesnost. 2020;(3):3-11 (in Russian).

2. Shchelokova LI. To the question about the historical prose of A. S. Pushkin in V. V. Bykov’s novels. Constants in Russian literature. Collected works for master’s students. Moscow: MCU; 2020:139-146 (in Russian).

3. Lebedenko VA. “Pushkin’s trail” in the cycle in the S.A. Esenin’s cycle “Persian motifs”. Contemporary Esenin study. 2020;54(3):77-80 (in Russian).

4. Romanov DA. About lingvopoetic traditions of the development of one of the theme in poetic texts: A. S. Pushkin and Ya. V. Smelyakov. Theory of Language and Intercultural Communication. 2023;48(1):302-313 (in Russian).

5. Debreczeny P. Social functions of literature: Alexander Pushkin and Russian Culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1997:300 (in English).

6. Dorofeeva EA. Pushkin and Sweden. Nordic and Baltic Studies Review. 2019;(4):118-135 (in Russian).

7. Kravchuk MN, Mozhgan ShR. Pushkin and Kazakhstan. Bulletin of Medical Internet Conferences. 2016;6(5):506 (in Russian).

8. Osepaishvili NS. Pushkin and Caucasus. Etnodialogi. 2014;45(1):82-86 (in Russian).

9. Basharina ZK. Interaction of Russian and Yakut literature in the 20th century (History and Problems of Interconnections). Yakutsk: Publishing House of NEFU; 2013:279 (in Russian).

10. Basharin K. Pushkin word in contemporary Yakutia. Etnodialogi. 2014;46(2):149-153 (in Russian).

11. Vinogradov SN. Pushkin and Udmurts. Yearbook of Finno-Ugric Studies. 2009;(1):288-290 (in Russian).

12. Voronko DG. Domestic and European literary traditions in A.S. Pushkin’s love poetry. Symbol of Science. 2022;12(1):32-33 (in Russian).

13. Epistle. Journal of Philology. 2024;4(7):128. [online]: https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=67318631 (in Russian).

14. Levakin NN. Art reception as a literary concept (on understanding the term). Izvestia PGU V. G. Belinsky. 2012;27:308-310 (in Russian).

15. Melnikova EG. The concept of reception: modern approaches to the analysis of cultural texts. Yaroslavl pedagogical bulletin. 2012;1(3):239-242 (in Russian).

16. “Let’s meet at Pushkin’s”: poets of Yakutia – to A. S. Pushkin: [poems]: to the 220th anniversary of birth of A.S. Pushkin. Yakutsk: 2019:104 (in Russian).

17. Zhavoronok. Birch forest. Encyclopedia of Slavic Сulture. Available at: https://lan26.ru/zhivotnye/zhavoronok [Accessed 23 March 2024] (in Russian).

18. Pushkin AS. Poems. Foreword by A. Tvardovsky. Khabarovsk: Book Publishing House; 1983:240 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Chaunina N.V. Reception of Pushkin’s personality and works in the lyrics of Yakut poets of the 20th – early 21st centuries. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. 2025;22(2):217-226. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2222-5404-2025-22-2-217-226

Views: 3


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2222-5404 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5620 (Online)